6. 从“十四五”到“十五五”中国经济化危为机的重大成就与展望 - 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所, gjs.cssn.cn/kydt/kydt_k…
This is better in that there is far less boilerplate, but it doesn't solve everything. Async iteration was retrofitted onto an API that wasn't designed for it, and it shows. Features like BYOB (bring your own buffer) reads aren't accessible through iteration. The underlying complexity of readers, locks, and controllers are still there, just hidden. When something does go wrong, or when additional features of the API are needed, developers find themselves back in the weeds of the original API, trying to understand why their stream is "locked" or why releaseLock() didn't do what they expected or hunting down bottlenecks in code they don't control.
。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
精彩一周即将到来。一切从北京时间下周一晚间，拉开序幕！。关于这个话题，91视频提供了深入分析
The design of Web streams predates async iteration in JavaScript. The for await...of syntax didn't land until ES2018, two years after the Streams Standard was initially finalized. This timing meant the API couldn't initially leverage what would eventually become the idiomatic way to consume asynchronous sequences in JavaScript. Instead, the spec introduced its own reader/writer acquisition model, and that decision rippled through every aspect of the API.